China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) 24: Art. 24 Automated decision-making: transparency, fairness, no unreasonable price discrimination, opt-out from targeted push, explanation and refusal of solely automated significant decisions

A processor using personal information for automated decision-making must ensure the transparency of the decision-making and the fairness and impartiality of the results and may not apply unreasonable differential treatment in transaction prices or other conditions; information push and commercial marketing based on automated decision-making must be accompanied by options not targeted at the individual's characteristics or a convenient means to refuse; and where a decision made solely by automated means has a significant impact on the individual's rights and interests, the individual may request an explanation and refuse a decision made only by automated means.