Supervision gaps are treated as risks. Vacancies and absences longer than four weeks go into the risk register with a rating, and any resulting skills or supervisory gap is rated critical and acted on. How risky it is to supervise a given test is judged on the qualifications and experience available, on volume, complexity and acuity, and on the track record: how many and what kind of errors, what feedback and complaints have come in, and what poor outcomes have occurred. The designated person revisits the supervision arrangements periodically and steps in to reduce the risk whenever a vacancy opens a supervisory gap.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.