Article 29 Working Party Opinion 2/2017 on Data Processing at Work (WP249)
Sections 5.8, 5.9 and 6: Disclosure, transfers and fundamental rights – Article 29 Working Party Opinion 2/2017 on Data Processing at Work (WP249)

Article 29 Working Party Opinion 2/2017 on Data Processing at Work (WP249) 6.1: 6.1 Owning the equipment does not remove employees' secrecy of communications; location tracking only where strictly necessary

Electronic communications from work premises, their content and traffic data, may fall within private life and correspondence under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights and deserve the same protection as analogue communications. Employer ownership of the devices does not take away employees' right to confidentiality of their communications, correspondence and the location data tied to them, and tracking employees' location through their own or company devices should go no further than a legitimate purpose strictly requires.

Maintained by Gerard Blokdyk

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

GDPR · 1 control

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in Sections 5.8, 5.9 and 6: Disclosure, transfers and fundamental rights – Article 29 Working Party Opinion 2/2017 on Data Processing at Work (WP249)

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.