What does 21 require?

The entity has security controls protecting its information assets, third-party-managed ones included, put in place in good time and calibrated to (a) the threats and vulnerabilities in play, (b) the assets' criticality and sensitivity, (c) where each asset sits in its life-cycle, from planning and design to decommissioning and disposal, and (d) what an incident could lead to.

APRA CPS 234 21: Para 21 Implement controls...

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

ISO 27001:2022 · 1 control

clause-6.1.3 Information security risk treatment

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of APRA CPS 234 have you already done?

APRA CPS 234 21 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of APRA CPS 234 your existing evidence covers. Hold NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and 19 of 48 APRA CPS 234 controls already carry evidence.

If you hold NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.039.6% covered · 29 gaps If you hold Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.137.5% covered · 30 gaps If you hold ISO 27002:202237.5% covered · 30 gaps If you hold NIS2 Directive37.5% covered · 30 gaps If you hold SOC 237.5% covered · 30 gaps If you hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 535.4% covered · 31 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 5 were rejected on the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free

APRA CPS 234 21: Para 21 Implement controls proportionate to risk and lifecycle