Where the institution is part of a group and any element of its risk management framework is controlled or influenced by another group entity, the framework must specifically take account of risks arising from the group framework and must clearly identify whether it is wholly or partly derived from group frameworks, policies, procedures or functions, the linkages and significant differences between the institution and group frameworks, how those linkages and differences change the institution risk profile, and the process for monitoring by or reporting to the group on risk management including key procedures, reporting frequency and the approach to reviews.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.